Re: Sony a7iii vs Fuji xt3: I NEED HELP! In reply to ianallen00 • Sep 24, 2018. I can get an X-T3, a 10-24, and a 55-200 for a total of about 2900, whereas buying fully new gear for the Sony would be give or take $3380. There is the problem for a spanking new release (X-T3), you end up paying a premium. I expect this package with a X-T2 or X
The lenses we used for this comparison were the 35mm f/2.0 ASPH lens for the M10-R, the 23mm f/2.0 for the Fuji, and the 28mm f/2.0 for the Sony. The 35mm lens from Leica is the most unassumingly Sony Alpha a6000 Vs Fujifilm X-T3: full comparison . Sony Alpha a6000 change. Vs. Fujifilm X-T3 change. 58. Overall Score. 63. Sony Alpha a6000; Announced: 23 Apr The Sony A6000 which is an APSC size sensor is the best sensor of the lot when it comes to IQ and ability to make very large prints. The Fuji X, also APSC, however, is in a whole different class and the reason to favor it over the others has to do with the XTrans filter array and the firmware that processes the image. When testing the Fuji X-T1 alongside the Sony A6000, I found the X-T1 to drain the battery slower in comparison. By the time I got to 50%, the Sony A6000 would already be at around 10-25%. Although I do not trust battery level indicators, just shooting with the two side by side on full battery power proved that the X-T1 did a better job at When it comes to shooting video for Stark Insider, Fujifilm is the one I have the least experience (just a X-T3 rental years ago). I have shot a lot on the GH5 as well as Sony (a6000, a6500, a7 III) and lots of Canon DSLR (60D/70D/80D). So the world of Fuji is a bit foreign to me. Nevertheless, the X-H2S seems to be a compelling option.